Uncharted waters: What the Liberation Day fallout means for investor portfolios

Better investing starts here
Get Betashares Direct
Betashares Direct is the new investing platform designed to help you build wealth, your way.
Scan the code to download.
Learn more
Learn more

What just happened

The “reciprocal tariffs” announced by US President Trump last week were generally higher than the market anticipated. All up, they effectively amount to an increase in the average US tariff of around 20%, compared to a 1.5% increase in Trump’s first term in office.

US Tariff revenue as % of imports

Source: US Bureau of Economic Analysis

The headlines

The market surprise stems partly from the fact that these “reciprocal tariffs” are much larger than if the tariff rates were based on actual tariffs charged by foreign countries.

For example, while China and the EU have average tariffs on US imports of around 3%, the White House determined that their average trade barriers were 67% and 39%, respectively. Allowing for Trump’s 50% ‘discount factor’ (because the US is ‘kind’), the US has then imposed reciprocal tariffs on China and the EU of 34% and 20%, respectively.

Why the difference?

The White House’s calculations used a crude formula based on the size of the bilateral trade imbalance the US has with each trading partner. The result of this approach is that countries that export much more than they import from the US, such as Vietnam and many others in the emerging markets, have been hit especially hard with tariff increases. This outcome is irrespective of a country’s own level of trade protection against the US and whether the US could viably replace these imports with local production (think exotic fruits or labour-intensive apparel manufacturing).

Subsequently Trump signalled he was open to negotiation on tariffs in return for ‘phenomenal’ deals. Instead, China countered with a 34% tariff on all US imports starting April 10.

What comes next

While the tariff announcement answered some questions, continued market volatility should be expected as the financial markets come to grips with the full impact and the potential for trade war escalation remains.

Potential for trade negotiations

We do think there’s a possibility that negotiation will lower some of these tariffs. However, successful negotiation will not arrive quickly, as it’s not yet clear what the US would deem sufficient concessions from its trading partners. And even if tariff reductions succeed, it’s still likely that tariff levels will be meaningfully higher than previously anticipated. We are of the view that Trump primarily views tariffs as a tool for reshoring manufacturing and raising revenue, rather than as a negotiating tactic.

Potential for tax cuts

The announced tariffs are much higher than was generally anticipated. From a revenue raising perspective, some have estimated these tariffs will be close to matching Trump’s goal of bringing in US$500 billion.

If he is successful in this, it opens the door for one of Trump’s more market friendly policies – tax cuts. Over the weekend, the US Senate passed a budget resolution which, if approved by the House of Representatives, may allow the fast tracking of Trump’s plan to extend existing tax cuts that were due to expire later this year. Also on Trump’s agenda is corporate tax cuts, that would boost US equity market earnings, lending support to stock prices. They could also help Republicans hold onto their slim majorities in the Congressional mid-terms.

Implications across asset classes

Global equities

There are few equity market winners from a trade war. Global stock markets fell sharply for a second consecutive day on Friday, with the S&P 500 and STOXX Europe 600 Indices both down more than 5% after China’s tariff counterpunch.

At a sector level there has been a notable rotation, with traditional defensives outperforming cyclicals. Consumer staples and other less cyclical areas have held up relatively well, while companies with high supply chain exposure to Asia have been hit hard.

At an index level, US equity market valuations have been sustained this year due to high consensus forecast earnings growth. The risk is that, as the market assesses the potential impacts of these tariffs, those earnings forecasts may be revised lower which could lead to further downward pressure on share prices.

Another risk is that, if the US goes into recession, years of foreign investor net flows into US equities start to unwind. However, there aren’t a lot of better alternatives under a trade war scenario, as a US recession hurts all global equity markets.

Australian equities

The Australian dollar sold off heavily on Friday, and Monday saw large declines on the ASX. Yet, Australian equities may ultimately be relatively well-placed compared to other global markets over the intermediate to longer term. Firstly, the announced tariff rate for Australia was ‘only’ 10% and secondly, Australia’s economic ties with China could provide a backstop for the Australian market.

After striking back at the US on Friday, China will probably focus on supporting its domestic economy before attempting to negotiate with Trump. Xi Jinping will need to unleash significant stimulus to offset the expected 1 to 2% hit to Chinese growth from the tariffs. At least some of the stimulus will spill over into fixed asset investment creating demand for Australia’s commodities.

Bonds

In the market meltdown of last week, fixed rate government bonds were one of the few assets to rally. The protectionism and tariffs which are bad for global growth also pushed down long-term bond yields. The risk of recession increases the attractiveness of fixed rate bonds as a safe haven and their role in diversifying equity risk in a portfolio.

The implications for Australian fixed rate bonds are unambiguously strong. Unlike the US, Australia does not face the same inflation shock from tariffs and inflation expectations are on a downward trend, clearing the way for RBA rate cuts. This environment supports the case for Australian fixed rate bonds as a defensive investment.

Gold

Even before Trump was elected, gold was enjoying strong structural demand in a world of heightened geopolitical tension. After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, central banks from emerging market countries stepped up their buying of gold in lieu of US government bonds and US dollars.

Now gold is providing a very valuable hedge and source of liquidity against the fallout from an escalating trade war. Gold’s fall on Friday was most likely as a result of hedge funds selling all assets (including gold) to meet margin calls caused by the severe equity market sell off. Gold also serves as an inflation hedge, which is particularly relevant given the potential for increased inflation from tariffs.

As pressure mounts on the US exceptionalism narrative, and by extension the US dollar, gold can certainly continue to grind higher from here.

What to look out for

It is difficult to forecast the outlook with any level of conviction, given the potential impacts of global trade touching every country in the world as well as Trump’s unpredictability.

We are looking out for any further announcements of escalation or olive branches. In terms of financial markets, watch US equity earnings growth forecasts for any signs of a downward revision.

Tips for investors during volatile times

The extent of the current global changes, whether it be geopolitical or financial market volatility, creates challenges for all investors. But keeping in perspective that markets can be volatile and maintaining a long-term plan with your financial goals firmly in mind can help you to make rational investment decisions.

A well-diversified portfolio should also allow you to weather the storm and come out the other side.

This article contains general information only and does not take into account any person’s objectives, financial situation or needs. Investors should consider the appropriateness of the information taking into account such factors and seek financial advice. It is provided for information purposes only and is not a recommendation to make any investment or adopt any investment strategy. Future outcomes are inherently uncertain. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those contemplated in any opinions, estimates or other forward-looking statements given in this article.

Photo of Cameron Gleeson

Written By

Cameron Gleeson
Senior Investment Strategist
Betashares Senior Investment Strategist. Supporting all Betashares distribution channels, assisting clients with portfolio construction across all asset classes, and working alongside the portfolio management team. Prior to joining Betashares, Cameron was a portfolio manager at Macquarie Asset Management, Head of Product at Bell Potter Capital, working on JP Morgan’s Equity Derivatives desk and at Deloitte Consulting. Read more from Cameron.
keyboard_arrow_down

Explore

Markets

2 comments on this

  1. Tony Carr  /  8 April 2025

    Then is it time to consider a return to a Balanced Fund. I have been in a conservative option for 6 months.

  2. Alan Smith  /  8 April 2025

    I also switched to a conservative fund 6 months ago. I’m thinking of switching back to a growth fund. Your thoughts.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Previous article
Next article